Reader calls for probe into Roseville Police involvement in four trials

-A +A
Placer County Board of Supervisors or the Placer County Grand Jury should investigate Roseville Police’s involvement, assessment and terminology standards in both of the Veronica Martinez-Salcedo and Dana Gene Vogler trials. All four trials were a miscarriage of justice and a waste of state taxpayer money. I translated for Veronica’s family during both of the Martinez-Salcedo trials. The message the Roseville Police is saying in the Martinez-Salcedo case is that providing first aid and CPR to a infant or a child is a felony criminal offense, instead of being protected by both California and federal good Samaritan laws. Can the Roseville Police provide medical intervention or translation as they did in all four trials if they are not state licensed to provide this information? I also share a similar experience with the Vogler case. I was carjacked by a group of Hispanics who were posing as sheriff officers in 2001. I was informed by a California Highway Patrol officer at the time of my carjacking that my rights are to pull over in a safe environment. According to the Roseville Police Department, Vogler “was slow to yield the patrol car’s emergency light.” How come the paper did not print what the conditions were of this slow to yield in the outcome? I am curious as to what Roseville Police’s terminology is of the word slow? To me if a person takes five to 10 minutes to pull over in a safe environment, this would be considered slow to yield. If justice is to be served, then why is there any contradiction between the Roseville Police Department and California State Highway Patrol in their terminology and outcomes? Julianna Wiseman, Auburn